Reynaldo Hahn - Piano Quintet in F-sharp minor

Reynaldo Hahn (Spanish pronunciation: [ʁɛ.nal.do ha:n]; 9 August 1874 – 28 January 1947) was a Venezuelan-born French composer, conductor, music critic, and singer. He is best known for his songs – mélodies – of which he wrote more than 100.[예술 가곡이 유명하다. 어려서 파리로 갔으며 그뒤 파리 국립 음악원에서 쥘 마스네에게 배웠다. 1934년부터 〈피가로 Le Figaro〉지(誌)의 음악 비평가로 있었고, 1945년에는 파리 오페라단의 감독이 되었다.

자크 오펜바흐가 수립한 양식을 발달시킨 그의 오페레타에는 〈꿈의 섬 L'Î le du rêve〉(1898)·〈시불레트 Ciboulette〉(1923) 등이 있다. 그는 또한 〈테레즈가(家)의 축제 La Fête chez Thérèse〉(1910)와 〈푸른 신(神) Le Dieu bleu〉(1912)으로 대표되는 발레곡뿐만 아니라 에드몽 로스탕과 사샤 지트리를 비롯한 작가들의 희곡에 따르는 부수음악을 쓰기도 했다.

피아노 모음곡 〈화가의 초상 Portraits de peintres〉은 마르셀 프루스트의 시에서 영감을 받은 것인데, 프루스트는 소설 〈Jean Santeuil〉에서 안을 생생하게 묘사했다. 〈나의 노래에 날개가 있다면 Si mes vers avaient des ailes〉과 같은 훌륭한 예술 가곡 여러 편이 여전히 연주회 레퍼토리로 남아 있다. 그의 음악은 선율이 아름답고 우아하다. 그의 회고록은 당시의 문학·음악 생활상을 이해하는 데 귀중한 자료가 되고 있다.[다음 백과]

Contents

• 1Life and career
  • 1.1Early years
  • 1.21896 to 1913
  • 1.31914 to 1929
  • 1.41930 to 1947
•  

Piano Quintet in F-sharp minor

I. Molto agitato e con fuoco [0:00] II. Andante, non troppo lento [12:39] III. Allegretto grazioso [23:06]

Benjamin Baker & Bartosz Woroch, violin Adam Newman, viola Tim Lowe, cello James Baillieu, piano (2015)

 

Reynaldo Hahn's Piano Quintet is a work in three movements typically lasting around 28 minutes. "Hahn’s Piano Quintet was composed in 1922 and published the following year. Its opening is fresh, agreeably direct and completely without preamble. The style is both comfortably eclectic and unashamedly retrospective: modulation techniques suggest the most youthful works of Fauré, such as his A major Violin Sonata, Opus 13 (1875/6), while the natural songwriter’s intermittent taste for unassuming chordal repetition in the piano accompaniment to overt thematic exposition suggests a remote debt to Schubert. The music—and in particular its fleet-footed but economical piano part—has a deft, lucid mobility and an economy of rhetorical gesture far less easy to achieve than it sounds. A Dvorák-like openness and quasi-vernacular charm comes and goes, while at other times the pianist’s indefatigable ripplings suggest Mendelssohn’s piano-trio writing. A memorably successful second subject gives place to resourceful examination of both principal ideas. F sharp major expansiveness asserts itself late on in the movement, only to be subverted by the almost tongue-in-cheek terseness of a final return to the minor. The slow second movement presents a soulful, song-like theme in C sharp minor. Fauré seems to preside more closely over the unhurried triple time and the instrumentation itself. Tritonal opposition of non-cadential dominant sevenths and ninths enhance the ‘sidestepping’ effect of key changes, perhaps reminding one that the youthful Fauré had pursued Wagner performances to Bayreuth and to England in company with Messager in the eighteen-eighties, and suggesting that Wagnerian technique (not generally very apparent in Fauré’s stylistic make-up) might nonetheless be a productive subliminal influence for the perceptive Fauré disciple. This movement remains predominantly introverted, ostensibly heading towards a climax but then relaxing into the idyllic retrospection of an unexpected F major episode (ushering in a change of time signature). The dominant pedal note underpinning this passage conveys a certain quasi-rustic wistfulness which again suggests the prayer-like sensibility of certain quiet Dvorák chamber movements. Subsequent features include string unison writing (typical of Fauré) at moments of heightened intensity, ingenious combination of the themes from both foregoing sections (and time signatures), and a reprise of the secondary paragraph, heard now a semitone lower than before. The movement reaches an unhurried conclusion in the key of C sharp major. The Quintet’s third and last movement plays a time-honoured ‘is-it-a-scherzo/intermezzo-or-a-finale?’ game, launching itself with amiable simplicity as another would-be rustic conception over a musette-like pedal note. As this proceeds it begins to admit a touch of melodic ‘neo-Baroquery’. This, in studiedly perverse combination with the homespun wistfulness of the initial conception, seems almost to suggest the improbable intrusion of some synthetically conceived public school song. More to the point, it conveys a shrewdly misleading impression of much more episodic and unassuming structural thinking than is actually at work, as does the Schumannesque cleanness of the ensuing episode’s dialogue between melodic piano octaves and punctuating harmonic strings. Soon the main theme burgeons momentarily in E major. The thematic material of the first movement now becomes more prominent. Some ingeniously resourceful combination of these ideas with those of the slow movement ensues (embracing a mischievous false recapitulation in the key of F major, not F sharp) before a radiant statement of the inspired second subject from the work’s first movement bursts forth in A major. This, however, is not allowed to gain ideas above its station, and nor are we as near the end of the work as its appearance seems to suggest. The generalized example of Fauré and the specific one of Dvorák’s A major Piano Quintet seem to compete amicably (and convincingly) for the limelight. A recapitulation beset by agreeable sleights-of-hand extends the canonic and other possibilities of the music in an F sharp major coda which is in no hurry to end the proceedings but which, thanks to the memorably distinct nature of the principal themes, never threatens to outstay its welcome."